世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 318-333.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.01.002

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技成果转化的非正式机制、路径研究与展望

李晨光 罗杰   

  1. 北方工业大学经济管理学院,北京 100144
  • 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-03
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科基金青年项目“基于CAS 的产学研协同创新政策的响应机制研究”(20YJCZH066),北京市自然科学基金面上项目“北京市科技创新成果转化政策的适应性响应机制研究:多网络依赖与交互作用视角”(9222010),国家社会科学基金“系统韧性视角下产学研深度融合创新体系高效协同”(23BGL055)

Informal Mechanisms, Pathways Research and Prospects of Technology Transformation

LI Chenguang   LUO Jie   

  1. School of Economics, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
  • Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-03

摘要:

近年来,科技成果转化的非正式机制与路径因其灵活开放备受瞩目,但目前该领域的相关研究缺乏系统梳理。本文以“科技成果转化的非正式机制与路径”为研究主题,采用CiteSpace可视化软件,对2001—2023年WOS和CNKI数据库的161篇精选文献进行了计量分析,梳理了科技成果转化非正式机制的内涵,展示了相关研究热点,剖析了科技成果转化的非正式机制和路径,展望了前沿动向和研究机会。研究发现:1)国内外现有科技成果转化的非正式机制内涵尚未统一,但可以从人际互动、合同契约、转化代理视角进行辨析;2)科技成果转化的非正式机制与路径的相关研究涵盖非正式组织、非正式制度、私人关系、非正式网络、数智化时代、企业数字化、内部网络结构等主题;3)科技成果转化的非正式机制与路径的研究热点已从最初揭示非正式组织、制度在组织内外的运作关系,逐步转向数智化时代背景下的“非正式”因素影响效益研究。此外,构建了过程导向、内外部驱动因素影响的不同核心主体参与科技成果转化的非正式机制和路径分析框架。最后,探讨了科技成果转化的非正式机制与路径的未来研究方向,以期从新的视角丰富科技成果转化领域的研究。

关键词:

Abstract:

In recent years, informal mechanism of technology transfer has attracted significant attention due to its flexible and open mechanisms. However, the existing research of informal technology transfer lacks systematic organization and review. Focusing on the theme of “informal technology transfer”, this study utilizes CiteSpace visualization technology to conduct a quantitative analysis of 161 selected articles from the WOS (Web of Science) and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases, covering the period from 2001 to 2023. The study clarifies the connotation of informal technology transfer, presents the research hotspots, analyzes the mechanisms and pathways of informal technology transfer, and provides an outlook on emerging trends and research opportunities. Firstly, through a literature review, this paper discovers that the connotation of informal technology transfer has not been unified domestically and internationally. However, it can be distinguished from the perspectives of interpersonal interaction, contractual agreements, and transfer agents. Secondly, through textual analysis of existing research, this paper finds that studies related to informal technology transfer cover informal organizations, informal institutions, personal relationships, informal networks, the digital age, the digitalization of enterprises, and internal network structures. Thirdly, the research focus on informal technology transfer has evolved from initially revealing the operational relationships of informal organizations and institutions within and outside organizations to investigating the impact of “informal” factors in the context of the digital age. In addition, this study constructs an analytical framework for the implementation mechanisms and pathways of informal technology transfer, considering process orientation and the influence of internal and external driving factors on different key stakeholders’ involvement. Finally, the paper discusses future research directions for informal technology transfer, aiming to provide references for further in-depth studies in this field.

Key words: Technology Transfer, Informal Transfer Mechanisms and Pathways, Knowledge Mapping, CiteSpace