世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 716-725.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2022.08.003

所属专题: 生物安全

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

现代生物技术的物种安全风险及其治理对策

曾海燕1 彭喻钊2   

  1. 1.湖南女子学院马克思主义学院,长沙410004;2.长沙理工大学哲学系,长沙410114
  • 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-10-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代新兴增强技术前沿的人文主义哲学研究”(20&ZD044),湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“负责任创新视域下生物技术伦理问题研究”(20B309),湖南省教育厅重点项目“新兴生物技术的安全风险及其治理研究”(20A031),湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“基于负责任创新的基因编辑技术伦理风险及治理对策研究”(19YBA200)

Species Safety Risks of Modern Biotechnology and Its Governance Measures

ZENG Haiyan1   PENG Yuzhao2   

  1. 1. Marxist Institute, Hunan Women’s College, Changsha 410004, China; 2. Department of Philosophy, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
  • Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-28

摘要:

现代生物技术发展带来的物种安全风险已成为国家生物安全中迫切需要考虑的重要议题。物种多样性风险、物种质量风险、物种生境风险、外来物种入侵风险等是现代生物技术物种安全风险的重要表征。科学认知能力的有限性、技术异化引起的负向价值、科技创新风险治理能力的局限性,是造成物种安全风险的重要原因。为加强物种安全风险治理,推进现代生物技术健康发展,“政府-科学共同体-公民社会”应形成多元主体平等互动、民主协商的柔性治理模式。具体来说,政府应明确治理的主导地位,完善国家物种安全战略、相关法律和制度体系、部际间协调机制,提升风险治理能力;科学共同体应积极承担社会责任,弘扬科学精神,坚持负责任创新,完善制度化咨询与对话机制,增强话语权;公民社会应积极参与,加强非政府组织支撑,有效发挥媒体作用,保障和行使公众权利,发挥监督和反馈作用。

关键词: 科技治理, 现代生物技术, 物种安全风险, 负责任创新研究与发展

Abstract:

Species safety risks brought by the development of modern biotechnology have become an essential topic for urgent consideration in national biosecurity. Species diversity risk, species quality risk, species habitat risk, and risk from alien species invasion are crucial representations of species safety risks of modern biotechnology. The limited scientific cognition ability, the negative values caused by technological alienation, and the limitation of STI risk governance ability are the important causes of species safety risks. In order to strengthen species safety risk management and promote the healthy development of modern biotechnology, the “government-science community-civil society” should form a flexible governance model with equal interaction and democratic consultation among multiple actors. Specifically, the government should clarify the leading position of governance, improve the national species safety strategy, relevant laws and institutional systems and inter-ministerial coordination mechanism to enhance the risk governance capacity; the scientific community should actively assume social responsibility, promote the Scientific Spirit, adhere to Responsible Innovation and improve the institutionalized consultation and dialogue mechanism to enhance the voice; civil society should actively participate in STI governance process through strengthening the support of non-governmental organizations, effectively playing the role of the media, and safeguarding and exercising public rights in order to exert the role of monitoring and feedback.

Key words: Scientific and Technological Governance, Modern Biotechnology, Species Safety Risks, Responsible Innovation Research and Development