世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 504-517.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2021.11.004

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

美日宏观科技统筹协调机制及启示

孙婕1 沈恒超2   

  1. 1.中国社会科学院大学数量经济与技术经济系,北京102488;2.国务院发展研究中心创新发展研究部,北京100010
  • 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-09-01

Macro S&T Coordination Mechanism of the Us and Japan and Its Enlightenment

SUN Jie1   SHEN Hengchao2   

  1. 1.School of Quantitative & Technological Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China; 2. Division of Innovative Development Research, Development Research Center of the State Council, Beijing 100010, China
  • Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-09-01

摘要:

宏观科技统筹协调对于提高科技资源利用效率、在战略性科技领域尽快取得重大突破至关重要。美国和日本都在最高决策层加强了对战略性科技领域的顶层设计,发挥凝练战略目标、协调战略实施和统筹科技资源的作用。通过挖掘官方文件,首先介绍美国和日本执行宏观科技统筹协调任务的机构设置,详细研究核心机构的人员组成和职能分工;然后结合两国最新国家战略计划的决策、实施过程,具体剖析整套体系的跨部门运作模式;最后总结美国和日本做法的共同特点:层级高于国家行政管理部门的机构对体现国家意志的战略性科技领域的行政、技术和预算事务经费分配进行统筹协调,体现事权、财权相统一的原则;高水平科技咨询机构支撑最高级别的科技决策;各个环节注重整合政产学研各界的共识和力量。在此基础上为我国实践提出有益启示。

关键词: 科技战略, 宏观统筹, 美国, 日本

Abstract:

Macro-level scientific and technological coordination is essential to improve the efficiency of the S&T resources and to make breakthroughs in strategic S&T fields as soon as possible. Both the United States and Japan have strengthened the top-level design of strategic S&T fields at the central policy-making layer, which have played a role in condensing strategic goals, coordinating the implementation of tasks, and allocating S&T resources. Through the official documents of the U. S. and Japan, the paper first introduces the agencies involved in macro S&T coordination mechanism, and studies in detail the personnel composition and responsibilities of the core institutions. Then case study is conducted on the decision-making and implementation process of the latest national strategic plan, aiming to have an insight into the operation of the inter- departmental mechanism. Finally, the common characteristics of the mechanism of the U. S. and Japan are summarized: in strategic S&T fields which reflect the state will, institutions higher than administrative department coordinate administrative, technical and budgetary affairs; The allocation of funds reflects the unity of administrative power and financial power; The high level S&T consulting organization supports making the top-level S&T decisions; Each procedure strives to integrate the consensus and strength of the administrative departments, various industries, and academia. Their experiences provide useful enlightenment for Chinese practice.

Key words: S&T Strategy, Macro-coordination Mechanism, United States, Japan