世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 215-226.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.10.005 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2024.10.005

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

国家安全视阈下欧美知识产权安全政策体系研究

刘雪凤1 罗木鑫2 周瀚文3   

  1. 1.中国矿业大学公共管理学院;2.中国矿业大学孙越崎学院;3.新疆师范大学马克思主义学院
  • 发布日期:2025-04-24
  • 基金资助:
    中国矿业大学基本科研业务费项目重大项目培育专项基金“国家安全视角下专利威胁风险预警与防范研究”(2023ZDPYSK09),大学生创新创业项目“元宇宙关键技术演化路径识别及拓展研究——基于专利引文网络和语义分析”(202310290087Z),教育部人文社科项目(22YJA630043)

Research on the Policy System of Intellectual Property Security in Europe and America from the Perspective of National Security

LIU Xuefeng1 LUO Muxin2 ZHOU Hanwen3   

  1. 1.School of Public Management, China University of Mining and Technology;2.Sun Yueqi Honors College ,China University of Mining and Technology;3.College of Marxism, Xinjiang Normal University
  • Published:2025-04-24

摘要: 作为推动科技创新的政治保障和激发市场活力的关键举措,知识产权政策体系一直受到世界高度关注,深刻影响着国家科技安全和经济安全战略。本研究基于总体国家安全视阈,统合了国家安全概念的制度性拓展和知识产权政策体系的工具属性异化,对先行一步的欧美国家知识产权政策体系进行系统性研究,依据知识产权安全化理论的四类判别标准界定了知识产权安全政策,同时对欧美知识产权安全政策做出梳理与分析,根据政策法律文本和时代背景对其演变规律和政策成果进行重点研究。研究发现,美国知识产权安全政策呈现内生化演变的自致性安全政策反应,欧洲知识产权安全政策呈现防御化演变的外源性安全政策反应。最后,为我国完善知识产权安全政策体系提供系统性建议。

关键词: 国家安全;欧美国家;知识产权安全;政策体系

Abstract: As a key measure to promote the political guarantee of scientific and technological innovation and stimulate market vitality, the intellectual property policy system has always attracted great attention from the world, which has a profound impact on the national scientific and technological security and economic security strategy. Based on the overall national security perspective, this study integrates the institutional expansion of the concept of national security and the alienation of the instrumental attributes of the intellectual property policy system, conducts a systematic study on the intellectual property policy systems of European and American countries, defines the intellectual property security policies according to the four types of discrimination criteria of intellectual property security theory, and makes a combing and analysis of the intellectual property security policies in Europe and the United States, and focuses on the evolution law and policy achievements according to the policy legal text and the background of the times. The results show that the intellectual property security policy of the United States presents an endogenous evolution of the spontaneous security policy response, and the European intellectual property security policy presents an exogenous security policy response of defensive evolution, which ultimately provides systematic suggestions for improving the intellectual property security policy system in China.

Key words: National Security; European and American Countries; Intellectual Property Security; Policy System