世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 456-468.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.07.007

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能监管政策与措施的国际比较及启示

王恺乐1 陈云伟1,2 熊永兰1   

  1. 1.中国科学院成都文献情报中心科技创新评价研究中心,成都 610299;2.中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京 100190
  • 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-03
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目“天府实验室运行机制创新策略研究”(2022JDR0360),中国科学院成都文献情报中心创新基金青年项目“科技人才政策绩效评价模型研究——以我国五大科技创新中心为例”(E3Z0000306)

International Comparison and Inspiration of Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Policies and Measures

WANG Kaile1   CHEN Yunwei1,2   XIONG Yonglan1   

  1. 1. Sci-tech innovation Evaluation Research Center, National Science Library (Chengdu), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China; 2. Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-03

摘要:

随着技术的飞速发展,人工智能正在成为产业创新的重要抓手和新质生产力的重要驱动力,然而技术进步的同时也带来了伦理问题及安全问题等挑战。人工智能技术的安全和可控是科技安全的重要组成部分,有效治理与监管人工智能已经成为全球共识,而欧盟、美国和英国在人工智能监管方面已走在国际前列。本文从政策角度出发,系统梳理欧盟、美国和英国的人工智能监管措施发展脉络,并比较其在监管机构设置、监管范围及监管路径上的特色做法。研究发现,欧盟、美国和英国的人工智能监管模式各具特点,但均存在监管共性与共同趋势。论文基于此提出了我国在人工智能监管方面的对策建议,以期为制定人工智能监管策略提供决策参考。

关键词: 人工智能, 政策, 科技安全, 监管

Abstract:

With the rapid development of technology, artificial intelligence is becoming an important gripper for industrial innovation and a driving force for new quality productivity. However, technological progress also brings challenges, such as ethical and security issues. The security and controllability of artificial intelligence technology are important components of technological security, effective governance and regulation of artificial intelligence have become a global consensus, and the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom have taken the lead in artificial intelligence regulation internationally. This article systematically reviews the development of artificial intelligence regulatory measures in three regions from a policy perspective and compares their distinctive practices in regulatory agency settings, scope, and paths. Research has found that the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom have their own unique regulatory models, but there are also regulatory commonalities and common trends. Based on this, countermeasures and suggestions for artificial intelligence regulation are proposed for China to provide a decision-making reference for formulating artificial intelligence regulatory strategies.

Key words: