世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 383-397.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2022.11.001

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技金融政策文本量化及政策工具组合效应研究

温全1 贾敬敦1 乔晗2 黎晓奇1 王赫然1 王灿1   

  1. 1.科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心,北京100045;2.中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,北京 100049
  • 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-07
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金面上项目“面向高碳解锁的技术创新赋能规律与治理机制研究”(2022M711435)

Research on the Quantification of Science and Technology Financial Policy Text and the Effect of Policy Instrument Combination

WEN Quan1   JIA Jingdun1   QIAO Han2   LI Xiaoqi1   WANG Heran1   WANG Can1   

  1. 1. Torch High Technology Industry Development Center, Ministry of Science & Technology, Beijing 100045, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-07

摘要:

以我国1985— 2019 年国家层面科技金融政策数据为例,在回顾和梳理科技金融政策演化进程的基础上,依据扎根理论,通过Nvivo 质性分析软件,探索科技金融政策的文种类型、发文主体、政策工具类型及其具体内容,将科技金融政策工具提炼为供给型、需求型和环境型。同时,为深入分析各政策工具间的组合效应,采用模糊集定性比较分析方法,进一步探索总结我国科技金融政策在发展历程中的不同组合类型,具体总结为市场驱动型、政府-市场联动型和政策主导型三种。以政策工具间组合为切入点,再对科技金融政策的制定与经济发展和创新水平间的关系进行关联论述,进一步明晰我国科技金融发展战略的政策工具组态效应,对科技金融政策工具选择与组合决策具有一定参考价值。

关键词:

Abstract:

Taking the data of China’s science and technology financial Policy at the national level from 1985 to 2019 as an example, based on the review and sorting out the evolution process of science and technology financial policies based on reviewing and combing the evolution process of science and technology financial policy, Nvivo qualitative analysis software is used according to the rooted theory to explore the types of scientific and technological financial policies, the subject of the publication, the types of policy tools and their specific tool content, and refine the scientific and technological financial policy tools into supply type, demand type, and environmental type. In order to deeply analyze the selection and combination effects of various policy tools, the Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method was used to explore the different combinations in the development process of science, technology, and finance in China. The research found that our country's combination of science and technology finance policy tools can be summarized into three types: market-driven, government-market linkage, and policy-led. It also discusses the relationship between the establishment, economic development, and innovation level of the technology and finance policy with the combination of policy instruments. Further, it clarifies the configuration effect of policy instruments for the development strategy of Chinese science and technology finance, which has some reference value in the choice and combination of policy instruments. 

Key words: