世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 857-869.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2022.04.001

所属专题: 生物安全

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    

基于生物识别技术的全球个人信息安全治理研究

林梓瀚1 游祎2 史渊3   

  1. 1.中国电子系统技术有限公司,北京100141;2.外交学院图书馆,北京102206;3.北京交通大学法学院,北京100091
  • 出版日期:2022-12-25 发布日期:2023-01-28

Biometrics-based Research on the Governance Path of Global Personal Information Security

LIN Zihan1   YOU Yi2   SHI Yuan3   

  1. 1. China Electronic System Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing100141, China; 2. Library of China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing 102206, China; 3. Beijing Jiaotong University Law School, Beijing 100091, China
  • Online:2022-12-25 Published:2023-01-28

摘要:

随着生物识别技术被应用到不同的场景,由生物识别引起的个人信息安全问题倍受关注。本文通过文献调研等定性研究方法,归纳生物识别技术的应用场景以及其所带来的困境,进而分析国际组织、主要经济体对基于生物识别技术归集的个人信息治理政策。研究发现国际组织主要从原则性规范入手,利用“国际软法”对宏观的智能技术运用进行规范。在主要经济体层面,欧盟构建了严苛的治理体系,美国强调实用主义自下而上进行立法,日韩等国根据各自情况制定相应的个人信息保护政策,中国则力图构建效率与安全的平衡点。最后,运用比较分析研究方法,对欧美等经济体与我国当前有关生物识别技术的监管政策进行对比,得出对我国的启示,认为未来我国可借鉴欧美等作法,完善授权同意机制,可对生物识别技术进行分场景、分级别管制。

关键词: 生物识别, 信息安全, 法律规制, 治理路径

Abstract:

With the application of biometric technology to different scenarios, the security of personal information caused by biometric identification has become a significant concern. Through literature research and other qualitative research methods, we conclude the application of biometric technology to scenarios as well as the dilemma which it results and then analyze the international organizations and major economies’ policies on the governance of personal information based on biometric technology collection, and find that international organizations mainly start from the principle regulation and use "international soft law" to regulate the use of smart technology at the macro level. At major economic levels, the European Union (EU) has built a strict governance system, the United States emphasizes pragmatic bottom-up legislation, while Japan and Korea have formulated personal information protection policies according to their respective situations, and China has tried to achieve a balance point between efficiency and security. At the same time, using the comparative analysis research method, we compare the current regulatory policies on biometric technology in Europe, America, and other main countries with those in China, and then advise that China can learn from the practices mentioned above, to improve the mechanism of authorized consent, and regulate biometric technology by scenario and level.

Key words: Biometrics, Information Security, Laws and Regulations, Governance Path