世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 199-209.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2021.11.007

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

粤港澳大湾区科技创新人才政策演化特征及关系网络分析

孙殿超1 刘毅1,2 王春明3   

  1. 1.粤港澳大湾区战略研究院,广州510070;2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101;3.广东省科技图书馆(广东省科学院信息研究所),广州510070
  • 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-05
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科学院“千名博士(后)计划”引进专项(2021GDASYL-20210103110),粤港澳大湾区战略研究院建设专项“粤港澳大湾区国际科创中心与区域创新体系研究”(2021GDASYL-20210401001)

Analysis on the Evolution Characteristics and Social Network of Science and Technology Innovation Talent Policy in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area

SUN DianChao1   LIU Yi1,2   WANG Chunming3   

  1. 1. Institute of Strategy Research for Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Guangzhou 510070, China; 2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China; 3. Guangdong Science&Technology Library (Institute of Information Research, Guangdong Academy of Sciences), Guangzhou 510070, China
  • Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-05

摘要: 科技创新人才政策是政府部门实现科技创新人才资源优化配置及政府价值表达的重要工具手段。本文对粤港澳大湾区9+2城市2000—2020年的科技创新人才政策进行梳理,对政策文件的内外部属性及关系网络进行分析。研究发现:1)大湾区各城市科技创新人才政策数量总体上呈增长的趋势,政府价值取向和行政逻辑明显向科技创新转变;2)大湾区各城市科技创新人才政策发文主体的不同体现出各地对科技创新人才政策的主导实施程度、重视力度和部门协调程度有所差异;3)深圳、珠海、佛山、中山、江门大力引才,人才资源优势逐步凸显,广州、深圳、珠海、佛山、东莞等地注重人才的保障服务,东莞注重人才资源的开发和绩效管理;4)大湾区各城市产业发展定位的雷同导致人才发展目标同质化,人才竞争激烈;5)各地政策文件关系网络呈聚而不联的特征,深圳、珠海政策的聚集程度较高,广州、佛山、肇庆、江门未出现中心性特征或中心性特征较弱。因此,加强科技创新人才政策统筹规划、优化政策表达实施、错位布局共建共享对粤港澳大湾区科技创新人才高地建设具有重要意义。

关键词: 粤港澳大湾区, 国际科技创新中心, 科技创新人才, 人才高地, 政策工具

Abstract:

Science and technology innovation talent policy (STIP) is an important tool for government departments to allocate science and technology innovation talent resources optimally and to express government value. This study combed the STIP of 9 + 2 cities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area (GBA) from 2000 to 2020. Through quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis and text analysis, the internal and external attributes of the STIP, such as time evolution, voice weight, policy types, talent strategic objectives and social network were studied. The results are as follows: 1) The STIP in GBA experienced a rapid growth where government value orientation and administrative logic shifted to science and technology innovation; 2) The differences of the issuing departments of STIP in GBA reflected the voice weight and coordination degree of departments; 3) Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Foshan, Zhongshan and Jiangmen had made great efforts to attract talents, as a result, the advantages of human innovation resources are gradually highlighted. Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Foshan and Dongguan emphasized excellent service for talents, while Dongguan relatively emphasized the development and performance management of talent resources; 4) The similar industrial orientation of GBA also led to homogenization of talent competition. 5) The social network of policy documents in different cities show that the policies were centered but not linked. The centrality of STIP in Shenzhen and Zhuhai was high, while it was low in Guangzhou, Foshan, Zhaoqing and Jiangmen. Therefore, this paper concluded with implications of building the high-caliber talent hubs in GBA, including strengthening the overall planning of talent work, optimizing the expression and implementation of talent policy, and developing a differentiation strategy of GBA cities. 

Key words: Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area, International Science and Technology Innovation Center, Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents, High-caliber Talent Hubs, Policy Tools