世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 463-473.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2021.01.007

• 科技评价与评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美日韩德图像理解技术发展比较——基于DII数据库的实证分析

陈玮 钟书华   

  1. 华中科技大学公共管理学院,武汉430074
  • 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-08-23
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项“我国新一代信息技术智慧专业化评价及‘十四五’规划重点选择”(2020WKZDJC001)

A Comparative Study on the Development of Image Understanding Technology in China, the United States, Japan, SouthKorea and Germany—Empirical Analysis Based on DII Database

CHEN Wei   ZHONG Shuhua   

  1. School of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Online:2021-08-25 Published:2021-08-23

摘要: 以德温特数据库作为数据源,选取中美日韩德作为比较研究对象,对五国图像理解技术的总体趋势进行专利计量分析,并采用技术竞争力模型评估五国的技术竞争力。结果表明,中国在专利申请数量上遥遥领先,但在专利平均被引频次上远低于美国和日本;同时,美国几乎占据了图像理解技术的全部高被引专利。得益于海量的图像理解技术专利,中国的技术强度以微弱优势领先美国成为第一;但其技术影响指数低于期待值,远低于美日两国,反映了中国的图像理解技术多而不强的特征。日韩德在整体上的技术强度落后于中美,但在某一子技术领域各有所长。日本场景恢复技术的技术影响指数远超中韩德三国;而韩国的图像感知和解释技术专利在全球占比份额较大;德国在时空技术上的技术影响指数与专利分享指数均处于全球上游水平。为增强中国在图像理解技术领域的国际竞争力,建议中国推进图像理解技术研究向纵深发展,推动图像理解技术领域各子技术的均衡发展,加强图像理解技术领域国际合作,以及创新政府服务体系,营造技术发展良好环境。

关键词: 图像理解, 专利计量, 比较研究, 技术竞争力

Abstract: Taking the Derwent Innovations Index database as the data source, selecting China, the United States, Japan, South Korea and Germany as the comparative research objects, this paper analyzes the overall trend of image understanding technology in the five countries by patent metrology, and adopts the technology competitiveness model to evaluate the technical competitiveness of the five countries. The results show that China is far ahead in the number of patent applications, but the average cited frequency of patents is far lower than those of the United States and Japan. At the same time, the United States almost occupies all the highly cited patents of image understanding technology. Owing to a large number of image understanding technology patents, China's technical strength is slightly ahead of the United States, becoming the first. However, the technology impact index of China is below the expected value, far lower than those of the United States and Japan. The results indicate that China possesses plenty of image understanding technologies which commonly lack of influence. Overall, Japan, South Korea and Germany fall behind China and the United States in terms of technical strength, but each has its own advantages in a certain sub technical field. Japan's technology impact index of scene recovery technology is far higher than those of China, South Korea and Germany. South Korea's image perception and interpretation technology patents account for a large proportion in the world; Germany's technology impact index and patent sharing index of spatiotemporal technology are at the top level in the world. To enhance China's international competitiveness in the field of image understanding technology, it is suggested that China should promote the in-depth development of image understanding technology, promote the balanced development of various sub technologies in the field of image understanding technology, strengthen international cooperation in the field of image understanding technology, and innovate the government service system, so as to create a good environment for technology development.

Key words: Image Understanding, Patentometrics, Comparative Study, Technical Competitiveness