世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 524-535.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.07.009

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

全球人工智能标准化进展及我国发展建议

秦铭浩1,2,3 徐慧芳1,2   

  1. 1.中国科学院文献情报中心,北京 100190;2.中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京 100190;3.大连理工大学经济管理学院,大连 116024
  • 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-03

Global AI Standardisation Progress and Suggestions for China’s Development

QIN Minghao1,2,3   XU Huifang1,2   

  1. 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 3. School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-03

摘要:

目前人工智能领域竞争十分激烈,全球主要大国均把发展人工智能提升到国家战略的高度,多个国家和国际标准组织积极部署推进人工智能标准化战略。本文在梳理美国、欧盟、英国以及中国近年来标准化战略的基础上,进一步对全球355项人工智能标准的制定组织、主题覆盖情况、类型、范围以及领域分布进行分析。研究发现,全球人工智能标准化正迅速发展,各国依据自身技术发展水平,制定了独具特色的标准化战略;国际标准化组织在此过程中发挥着核心作用,而其他组织则在特定领域内产生关键影响;目前,标准化工作主要集中在确保技术系统的安全性、稳定性和数据治理规范性;大多数人工智能标准聚焦于水平领域,涵盖通用技术、伦理和安全性等基础问题。基于研究结论,为推动我国人工智能标准化工作,提出以下发展建议:完善中国人工智能法律制度;加强国际合作,积极制定人工智能领域国际标准;建立人工智能标准机构;明确国内人工智能标准化情况,巩固优势,补齐短板。

关键词: 人工智能, 标准化, 国际战略, 标准分析

Abstract:

The current state of competition in the field of artificial intelligence is characterised by a high level of intensity. The major global powers have elevated the development of artificial intelligence to the status of national strategy, and numerous countries and international standard organisations have adopted a proactive approach to promoting the standardization strategy of artificial intelligence. This paper further analyses the distribution of the 355 global AI standards in terms of their standard-setting organisations, coverage of standard topics, types of standards, scope of standards, and distribution of standard fields based on the standardisation strategies of the US, the EU, the UK and China in recent years. The study reveals that global AI standardization is developing at a rapid pace, with countries formulating distinctive standardisation strategies in alignment with their respective levels of technological advancement; the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) occupies a pivotal role in this process, while other organisations exert Specific areas are subject to particular influence; at present, standardisation efforts are concentrated on ensuring the safety, stability and data governance norms of technological systems; the majority of AI standards focus on horizontal domains, covering fundamentalissues such as general technology, ethics and safety. In light of the study’s findings, four recommendations are put forth to advance China’s AI standardisation efforts: (1) enhance China’s AI legal framework; (2) reinforce international collaboration and proactively shape international AI standards; (3) establish AI standard organisations; and (4) clarify the AI standardisation landscape in the country, capitalise on its strengths, and address its shortcomings.

Key words: Artificial Intelligence, Standardisation, International Strategy, Standards Analysis