世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 350-370.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2023.12.006

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

传统能源行业领军企业绿色创新生态演进机制和路径研究

李正锋 史力睿 蔡建峰   

  1. 西北工业大学管理学院,西安 710072
  • 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-03
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金“领军企业高管团队动态激励、研发资源配置对突破性技术创新的影响研究”(22YJA630044),陕西省社会科学基金“创新链视角下陕西制造业企业绿色创新质量提升机制和实现路径研究”(2023R035)

Research on Ecological Evolution Mechanism and Path of Green Innovation of Leading Enterprises in Traditional Energy Industry

LI Zhengfeng   SHI Lirui   CAI Jianfeng   

  1. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072 , China
  • Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-03

摘要:

领军企业绿色创新对推动企业绿色低碳发展具有示范和辐射效应。本文基于资源编排和生态位理论,以国有领军企业陕煤集团和民营领军企业潞宝集团为案例研究对象,分析了传统能源行业领军企业绿色创新生态的内在演进机制,探讨了不同所有制领军企业的共性特征和差异化表现。研究发现:第一,以关键事件划分时序区间,领军企业绿色创新生态演化可以划分为3个阶段,且不同阶段的制度逻辑、资源编排和行为特征存在明显差异;第二,领军企业绿色创新生态演进的关键因子为环境响应、资源编排、创新能力和价值创造,通过关键因子的协同作用,企业绿色创新生态均呈现出从态能积累到势能提升到适宜度优化的共性演进过程;第三,不同所有制领军企业在多重制度逻辑约束下,在绿色创新生态演进过程中表现出显著的差异性,国有领军企业遵循主动响应的创新战略,通过资源的“内延式整合”创新机制推动绿色创新生态的进阶,而民营领军企业则遵循组织自适应的创新战略,通过资源的“外延式拓展”创新机制推动绿色创新生态的迭代演进。本研究从“情景驱动—协同治理—演进结果”整合视角下探讨了领军企业绿色创新生态从构建到演进的内在机制和核心要素,揭示了国有和民营领军企业因绿色创新战略导向的不同,在演进逻辑、治理模式和行为特征上的差异性。研究结论为传统能源行业领军企业绿色创新生态升级和实现绿色高质量发展,提供了理论支撑和管理启示。

关键词:

Abstract:

Green innovation of leading enterprises has a demonstration and radiation effect on promoting green and low-carbon development of enterprises. Based on resource orchestration and niche theory, this paper takes Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group, a state-owned leading enterprise, and LuBao Coking Group, a private leading enterprise, as case studies, analyzes the internal evolution mechanism of green innovation ecology of leading enterprises in traditional energy industry, and discusses the common characteristics and differentiated performance of leading enterprises with different ownership. The study makes three valuable findings. First, the ecological evolution of leading enterprises’ green innovation can be divided into three stages, dividing the time series interval by key events, and there are obvious differences in institutional logic, resource orchestration and behavior characteristics in different stages. Second, the key factors in the evolution of the green innovation ecology of leading enterprises are environmental response, resource orchestration, innovation ability and value creation. Through the synergy of key factors, the green innovation ecology of enterprises all embodies the common evolution process from state energy accumulation to potential energy improvement to suitability optimization. Third, under the constraints of multiple institutional logics, leading enterprises of different ownership systems show significant differences in the evolution of green innovation ecology: state-owned leading enterprises follow the innovative strategy of active response and promote the advancement of green innovation ecology through the innovation mechanism of “internal integration” of resources; however, private leading enterprises follow the innovation strategy of organizational adaptation, and promote the iterative evolution of green innovation ecology through the innovation mechanism of “extensional expansion” of resources. The conclusion mainly contributes that to promote the evolution of green innovation ecology from the perspective of leading enterprises based on “facilitating scenario-collaborative governance-evolution results”. It also explores new analysis dimensions from the differences in evolution logic, governance model and behavior characteristics between state-owned and private leading enterprises due to the different strategic orientations of green innovation. It provides theoretical support and management enlightenment for the leading enterprises in the traditional energy industry to promote the ecological upgrading of green innovation and achieve green and high-quality development.

Key words: Leading Enterprises, Green Innovation, Resource Orchestration, Niche Theory