世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 667-676.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2020.06.004

• 科技政策与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技计划评估理论研究回顾与展望

翟亚宁1 李昂2   

  1. 1.北京科技创新研究中心,北京100744;2.北京科学仪器装备协作服务中心,北京100035
  • 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2020-12-29

Review and Prospect of Research on the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Plans

ZHAI Yaning1   LI Ang2   

  1. 1.Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Research Center, Beijing 100744, China; 2.Beijing Scientific Instrument and Equipment Collaboration Service Center, Beijing 100035, China
  • Online:2020-12-25 Published:2020-12-29

摘要: 不断丰富科技计划评估理论体系、优化科技计划评估实践活动对完善科技创新治理体系有着重要的意义。本文对当前国际评估界常用的政府绩效评估理论、“市场失灵”理论、第四代评估理论、系统论、“事实-价值”相关结合理论进行了全面评述,提出了未来科技计划评估理论两种态势:一是新一轮科技革命的爆发将引起评估理论研究使用多元化、复合化,二是评估理论研究与使用将更加注重工具理性与价值理性的统一。在上述基础上,建议我国当前需要发展具有中国特色的科技计划评估理论,该理论应具备以下特点:一是适宜于我国科技创新治理特点需要;二是正确处理好效率与公平公正的关系;三是注重事实与价值相统一;四是能够广泛富有中国特色社会主义文化基因。

关键词: 科技计划, 评估理论, 科技创新治理, 第四代评估

Abstract: Continuously enriching the scientific and technological plan evaluation theory system and optimizing the scientific and technical plan evaluation practice activities are of great significance for improving the technological innovation governance system. This article makes a comprehensive review of the current government evaluation theory, "market failure" theory, fourth-generation evaluation theory, system theory, and "fact-value" related combination theory commonly used in the international evaluation community, and proposes two future situations of science and technology plan evaluation theories: First, the outbreak of a new round of scientific and technological revolution will lead to the diversification and compounding of evaluation theory research; and second, more attention are to be paid to the unity of instrumental rationality and value rationality in the research and application of evaluation theory. On these basis, it is suggested that China needs to develop a science and technology plan evaluation theory with Chinese characteristics. The theory should have the following characteristics: First, it is suitable for the characteristics of China’s scientific and technological innovation governance; Second, the relationship between efficiency and fairness and justice should be properly handled; Third, it pays attention to the unity of facts and values; Fourth, it can broadly enrich the socialist culture with Chinese characteristics.

Key words: Science and Technology Plan, Evaluation Theory, Technology Innovation Governance, Fourth-generation Evaluation